Tarantino has always attracted controversy, but prior to the release of Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, The Guardian jumped the gun, publishing a piece with the boldly presumptuous title: “Why It's Time To Cancel Quentin Tarantino.” My personal take is that Sharon Tate wasn’t designed to be a character, but a concept, an archetypical innocent “princess,” alluding to the fairytale-esque nature of the story.īut it would have been nice to hear the director’s intentions. Instead of viewing the question as an aggression, it would have been interesting to hear his thought process behind the decision. It was a silly response to a legitimate question Tarantino clearly made the decision to depict Robbie’s character, Sharon Tate, as a happy-go-lucky figure who says little and does nothing to impact the plot. Tarantino appeared to bristle at the question, perhaps perceiving it as a subtle accusation of sexism, and answered, “Well, I just reject your hypothesis.” And I just wanted to know why that was that we don’t hear her speak that much.” I guess that was a deliberate choice on your part. “This is a person with great acting talent and yet you haven’t given her many lines in the movie. The true nature of the scene appears to be explained prior by Al Pacino’s character, who is outlining the concept of a “heavy,” a tough antagonist destined to lose a fight against the hero, intended to inflate the audience’s admiration of said hero.Ĭlearly, Tarantino was using Bruce Lee as the “heavy” to induce our admiration for Cliff, and wobbled with the execution.ĭuring a press conference, Tarantino was asked by a reporter why he chose to limit the dialogue and screen time of talented actress Margot Robbie: Not only did he say that, but his wife, Linda Lee, said that in her first biography I ever read…. If people are saying, ‘Well he never said he could beat up Muhammad Ali,’ well yeah, he did. “I heard him say things like that, to that effect. The entire scene could simply be a fantasy, or exaggerated version of a memory, a tale twisted by Cliff’s perception.īut Tarantino’s comments made in defense of the controversial scene do not acknowledge the ambiguity, the director instead choosing to double down, making the claim that Lee was “kind of an arrogant guy,” and that his scripted boasts were accurate. Said scene is part of a flashback, in which the aging stuntman Cliff is fondly remembering his time on set. There is, however, an ambiguity to the controversial scene that calls into question whether Tarantino’s Lee is as outrageous as he appears. In fact, Rick made quite the impression on the late-night host and was asked to come back as a regular guest throughout the '70s.“While I understand that the mechanism in the story is to make Brad Pitt’s character out to be such a badass that he can beat up Bruce Lee, the script treatment of my father as this arrogant, egotistical punching bag was really disheartening - and, I feel, unnecessary.” TV Guide did an inside profile of him, and he was even asked to appear on The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson. He didn't quite become an A-list star like Steve McQueen, but Rick enjoyed a more-than-modest resurgence in the limelight. Shortly after the incident, Rick was offered a guest-starring role on one of the biggest shows on TV at the time, Mission Impossible. Rick's newfound notoriety materialized in the form of more acting work. The optics of Bounty Law's Jake Cahill defending his family from murderous long-haired hippies turned Rick into an anti-counterculture symbol for Richard Nixon's "silent majority." As a former TV cowboy still sporting a pompadour in the late '60s, it makes sense that some political voices latched onto this episode of brutal violence as an uplifting cautionary tale. RELATED: Tarantino Blasts Critics of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood's Most Controversial Scene
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |